Income, market and asset. The framework is constant. What changes is which one leads for your business.
There are three approaches to valuing a business. The income approach values it on the cash it is expected to generate, the market approach on what comparable businesses have sold for, and the asset approach on what its assets are worth less its liabilities. A defensible valuation considers all three and explains the weighting.
What is the present value of the cash this business is expected to generate?
Read the methodWhat have comparable businesses actually sold for, or what do comparable listed companies trade at?
Read the methodWhat are the assets worth, less the liabilities, if each were restated to market value?
Read the methodThe results of each method applied are set out side by side as a low and a high. The valuer then explains the weighting in words: which approach best reflects how a buyer would actually think about this business, which were used as cross-checks, and which were not applied at all and why, whether that is an absence of reliable comparables or a business that simply is not asset-driven.
The conclusion is an enterprise value range. Interest-bearing debt is deducted, surplus assets and liabilities are added or subtracted, and the result is equity value for 100 per cent on a controlling, marketable basis. Discounts for lack of control or lack of marketability are then applied where the interest being valued calls for them.
That reconciliation narrative is a large part of what makes the opinion defensible, and it is the section another expert reads first.
How much of it appears in your report depends on the depth you need. An Indicative valuation is for internal decision-making and is not written for third party reliance. A Summary report sets out the approaches applied and the reasoning behind them, and a Detailed report applies and reconciles all relevant approaches in full.
For internal decision-making. Useful for testing an offer, setting an expectation before a negotiation, or deciding whether to go to market. It is not written for third party reliance.
Sets out the approaches applied, the normalisation adjustments made and the reasoning behind the conclusion. The usual choice for a sale, an ownership change or a finance application.
Applies and reconciles all relevant approaches in full. The level required where a court, the ATO, a lender or another expert will review the opinion.